Logourl black
From our private database of 14,000+ case briefs...

Fisher v. Congregation B'nai Yitzhok

Pennsylvania Superior Court
110 A.2d 881 (Pa. Super. 1955)


Facts

Rabbi Herman Fisher (plaintiff) was an orthodox Hebrew rabbi. Congregation B’nai Yitzhok (Congregation) (defendant) was an orthodox Hebrew congregation. Fisher contracted with the Congregation to officiate as cantor in the Congregation’s synagogue for six services during the High Holiday Season. Under the Torah and other orthodox Jewish law, men and women are not allowed to sit together during services in the synagogue. This religious custom was not written in the contract. After the contract was signed, the Congregation changed its policy as to men and women sitting together in synagogue, for the first time allowing them to sit together. When Fisher learned of this new policy, he told the Congregation that he would no longer be able to officiate as cantor because the Congregation’s new seating practice would violate his beliefs. Given the late notice he received of the change in seating policy, it was too late for Fisher to obtain other officiating jobs during the Holiday season. Accordingly, Fisher brought suit against the Congregation to recover what he would have received from the contract. At trial, Fisher presented testimony of the Congregation’s rabbi who stated that he told Fisher before the contract was signed that the Congregation followed the segregated seating tradition. The trial court ruled in favor of Fisher. The Congregation appealed.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Hirt, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A "yes" or "no" answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 202,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.