Logourl black
From our private database of 13,800+ case briefs...

Fisher v. Giuliani

Supreme Court of New York, Appellate Division, First Department
720 N.Y.S.2d 50 (2001)


Facts

In 1998, New York City amended some zoning regulations affecting the Manhattan Theater District. The regulations were designed to curb the destruction of theaters by permitting the transfer of development rights to parcels within the Theater Subdistrict, subject to useable space limitations. (These transfers are referred to as “as-of-right” transfers.) In addition, the amendments permitted the issuance of discretionary permits, by which developers could apply for and receive additional useable space. Consistent with the State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA) and the City Environmental Quality Review (CEQR), the Department of City Planning (DCP) conducted an environmental assessment. The assessment concluded that the amended regulations regarding “as-of-right” transfers would result in no significant impact on the environment, and therefore no environmental impact statement was required. The CPC declined to prepare an environmental assessment with respect to the discretionary, non-“as-of-right” transfers, reasoning that an environmental assessment could be made when an actual application had been filed. A group of citizens (plaintiff) filed suit challenging the adequacy of the environmental assessment and its findings, and alleging that an environmental impact statement should have been prepared. The trial court annulled the regulations and ordered that an environmental impact statement be prepared. The city (defendant) appealed.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Holding and Reasoning (Friedman, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 169,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 13,800 briefs, keyed to 187 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.