Fisher v. Steward

1 Smith 60 (1804)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Fisher v. Steward

New Hampshire Supreme Court
1 Smith 60 (1804)

  • Written by Melanie Moultry, JD
Fisher v. Steward

Facts

Abraham Fisher (plaintiff) discovered a swarm of bees in a tree that was located on land owned by Jonas Steward (defendant). Fisher marked the tree and notified Steward of the discovery. Steward cut down the tree and used the honey produced by the bees for his own purposes. Fisher brought an action in trover for the bees and for 200 pounds of honey in the comb. The questions raised at trial were whether Fisher had first discovered the bees and, if so, whether Fisher had a property right to the bees’ honey. Fisher did not claim to have a property right to Steward’s land, the tree, or the bees. The New Hampshire Supreme Court addressed the issue of whether Fisher’s discovery of the bees gave him a property right to the honey. The court also addressed the issue of whether to apply the local custom of granting a property right in bees to the person who finds the bees.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning ()

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 811,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership