New Hampshire Supreme Court
1 Smith 60 (1804)
Abraham Fisher (plaintiff) discovered a swarm of bees in a tree that was located on land owned by Jonas Steward (defendant). Fisher marked the tree and notified Steward of the discovery. Steward cut down the tree and used the honey produced by the bees for his own purposes. Fisher brought an action in trover for the bees and for 200 pounds of honey in the comb. The questions raised at trial were whether Fisher had first discovered the bees and, if so, whether Fisher had a property right to the bees’ honey. Fisher did not claim to have a property right to Steward’s land, the tree, or the bees. The New Hampshire Supreme Court addressed the issue of whether Fisher’s discovery of the bees gave him a property right to the honey. The court also addressed the issue of whether to apply the local custom of granting a property right in bees to the person who finds the bees.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 220,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.