Fisher v. United States
United States Supreme Court
328 U.S. 463, 66 S.Ct. 1318, 90 L.Ed. 1382 (1946)

- Written by Rich Walter, JD
Facts
The United States government (plaintiff) charged Fisher (defendant), a janitor at the National Cathedral in Washington, D.C., with first-degree murder. Fisher was tried in federal district court, where he asserted a defense of partial responsibility and sought to reduce the charge to second-degree murder. The evidence proved that Fisher killed the cathedral librarian immediately after she complained about the library's cleanliness and used a racial epithet to insult him. Fisher had below-average intelligence and an aggressive psychopathic personality, and his actions at the time of the murder displayed the impulsive behavior of someone driven by primitive emotions. However, Fisher knew right from wrong, and had he been a person of normal intelligence, there could have been little doubt that he acted with the requisite deliberation and premeditation to sustain a conviction for first-degree murder. Fisher's attorney asked that the jury be instructed to consider Fisher's personality in determining his intent, deliberation, and premeditation. The judge refused, and after the jury found Fisher guilty as charged, the judge sentenced Fisher to death. The appellate court affirmed the judgment and sentence, and Fisher appealed to the United States Supreme Court.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Reed, J.)
Dissent (Rutledge, J.)
Dissent (Murphy, J.)
Dissent (Frankfurter, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 815,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.