Fisheries Jurisdiction (United Kingdom v. Iceland)

1973 I.C.J. 3

From our private database of 46,100+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Fisheries Jurisdiction (United Kingdom v. Iceland)

International Court of Justice
1973 I.C.J. 3

Facts

Iceland (defendant) sought to extend its exclusive fisheries jurisdiction from twelve to fifty miles around its shores. The United Kingdom (UK) challenged this extension of jurisdiction and sought to submit the case to the International Court of Justice (ICJ.) The UK relied upon an earlier treaty agreement between the parties where the UK agreed to recognize Iceland’s twelve-mile exclusive fisheries jurisdiction in exchange for Iceland’s agreement to submit all disputes over fisheries jurisdiction to the ICJ. Iceland argued that it was not bound by this agreement to submit all disputes to the ICJ, however, because of changing legal circumstances in international law. Iceland argued that the standard, default limit for exclusive fisheries jurisdiction for states was typically now twelve miles. This was not the case when Iceland first signed its agreement with the UK, however, and the agreement to a twelve-mile limit then constituted a compromise for Iceland. Due to changing trends in international law, Iceland argued that its previous agreement to the twelve-mile compromise in exchange for ICJ jurisdiction was now void for lack of consideration on the UK’s part.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning ()

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 745,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 745,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,100 briefs, keyed to 987 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 745,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,100 briefs - keyed to 987 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership