Quimbee logo with url
From our private database of 14,900+ case briefs...

Fitl v. Strek

Supreme Court of Nebraska
690 N.W.2d 605 (2005)


Facts

James Fitl (plaintiff) bought a baseball card from Mark Strek (defendant) for $17,750. Strek told Fitl that the card was in near mint condition. After purchase, Fitl immediately placed the card in a safety deposit box. Nearly two years later, Fitl had the card appraised. Multiple appraisers determined that the card had been altered and was worthless. Fitl immediately notified Strek of the defect. Fitl then sued Strek. The district court held that Fitl had notified Strek within a reasonable time after discovering the defect and entered judgment for Fitl for $17,750. Strek appealed, arguing that Fitl’s notification of the defect two years after purchase was not timely.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Wright, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 284,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,900 briefs, keyed to 201 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.