Fitzgerald v. Racing Association of Central Iowa
United States Supreme Court
539 U.S. 103 (2003)
- Written by Eric Miller, JD
Facts
Iowa enacted a statute that permitted casinos to operate slot machines. The resulting revenue was subject to taxation, but tax rates differed based on the type of casino involved. For racetrack casinos, the maximum tax rate was 36 percent; however, for riverboat casinos, it was 20 percent. A group of racetrack casino owners brought suit, alleging that the statute violated their equal-protection rights. The Iowa Supreme Court interpreted the statute as having the primary objective of boosting the economically troubled racetrack casino industry and found the differential tax rate unconstitutional. The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Breyer, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 814,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.