Fitzgerald v. Salsbury Chemical, Inc.

613 N.W.2d 275 (2000)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Fitzgerald v. Salsbury Chemical, Inc.

Iowa Supreme Court
613 N.W.2d 275 (2000)

  • Written by Robert Cane, JD

Facts

Tom Fitzgerald (plaintiff) worked for Salsbury Chemical, Incorporated (Salsbury) (defendant) as a production foreman. Fitzgerald supervised Richard Koresh, a production worker. On August 15, 1995, Koresh provided deposition testimony for a wrongful-death action brought by the estate of a former Salsbury employee, John Kelly, who died due to an explosion at the plant. Koresh’s testimony was adverse to Salsbury. After the deposition, Koresh felt shunned by management and was told by a foreman that Salsbury was going to find a way to fire him. On August 30, Koresh was involved in an incident that created a potentially dangerous condition. Koresh was suspended on September 4 and subsequently terminated on September 19. The plant operations manager had discussed the matter of Koresh’s discipline with Fitzgerald on the day of Koresh’s termination. Fitzgerald expressed that he thought it was unfair to fire Koresh for his one mistake taking into consideration his many years of service to the company. The manager told Fitzgerald to figure out which side he was on because the matter would potentially result in a lawsuit. Salsbury terminated Fitzgerald several hours after this conversation. Fitzgerald filed an action for wrongful discharge, alleging Salsbury had terminated him in violation of public policy because he opposed the unlawful termination of Koresh and intended to provide truthful testimony in potential court proceedings. The trial court dismissed Fitzgerald’s claim. Fitzgerald appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Cady, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership