Fix v. First State Bank of Roscoe

807 N.W.2d 612 (2011)

From our private database of 46,200+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Fix v. First State Bank of Roscoe

South Dakota Supreme Court
807 N.W.2d 612 (2011)

Facts

Rita Fix (plaintiff) had a life estate in a house on property owned by her son and daughter-in-law, Jeff and Marie. In order to help Jeff and Marie secure a loan from the First State Bank of Roscoe (bank) (defendant), Fix gave Jeff and Marie a warranty deed to the house. To allay Fix’s fears of being displaced if Jeff and Marie defaulted on the loan, the bank promised Fix in writing that Fix could remain in the house for the rest of her life, even if the bank took ownership of the property. After experiencing financial problems, Jeff and Marie conveyed the house and property to the bank in lieu of foreclosure. The bank then sold the property to a third party and tried to eject Fix. Fix, Jeff, and Marie subsequently were indicted in state court in connection with a scheme by which Jeff allegedly sold grain that was covered by the bank’s security interest using Fix’s name, with Fix paying over to Jeff the sale proceeds she received. Jeff pleaded guilty, and the charges against Marie were dismissed, but the charges against Fix remained in limbo despite Fix’s requests that she be charged or cleared. Ultimately, Vaughn Beck (defendant), the state’s attorney who brought the indictments and who also represented the bank civilly, offered to drop the criminal charges against Fix if she agreed to deed the house to the bank. Fix, who already had a claim pending against the bank for the intentional infliction of emotional distress, amended her complaint to add a claim for abuse of process regarding Beck’s alleged use of the criminal charges to improperly further the bank’s interest in the house. Fix settled with Beck. The court granted summary judgment against Fix’s intentional-infliction-of-emotional-distress claim. At trial, the jury found for Fix on her abuse-of-process claim but awarded her no damages. Fix appealed, arguing, among other things, that the abuse-of-process jury charge on damages was mistaken because the court instructed the jury that Fix had to prove that she suffered extreme and disabling emotional distress as a proximate cause of the abuse of process.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Meierhenry, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 782,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 782,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,200 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 782,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,200 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership