Flannery v. United States
United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
718 F.2d 108 (1983)
- Written by Serena Lipski, JD
Facts
Michael George Flannery (plaintiff) was 22 years old when he was severely injured in a car accident, rendering him permanently comatose. The other driver, who was at fault, was a federal employee on official business at the time of the accident. Flannery sued the United States (defendant) under the Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA), and the court applied West Virginia tort law. During trial, evidence was presented that Flannery would live as long as 30 years, but during that time he would require little skilled medical care. Instead, Flannery would primarily involve the type of custodial care provided in a nursing home. Flannery was awarded $2.2 million in damages. Among other things, the award included $316,984 for future medical expenses, $535,855 for impairment of earning capacity, and $1.3 million for the loss of the ability to enjoy life. While the case was pending, the West Virginia Supreme Court of Appeals ruled that an award for the loss of the ability to enjoy life was not punitive. The United States appealed regarding the computation of damages, arguing that the FTCA did not permit punitive-damage awards and that the award for future medical expenses was partially duplicative of the award for impairment of earning capacity.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Haynsworth, J.)
Dissent (Hall, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.