Fleischman v. Commissioner

45 T.C. 439 (1966)

From our private database of 46,100+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Fleischman v. Commissioner

United States Tax Court
45 T.C. 439 (1966)

SR
Play video

Facts

On February 22, 1955, Meyer J. Fleishman and Joan Ruth Francis entered an antenuptial agreement. The agreement stipulated that in the event of a divorce, Meyer would pay Joan $5,000, who in turn would release all her rights to Meyer’s property. In 1961, Joan initiated divorce proceedings. In contravention of the prenuptial agreement, she sued for fair and equitable division of all property. However, the court overseeing the divorce proceedings lacked authority to invalidate the antenuptial agreement. Thus, in a separate action, Joan sued to set aside the antenuptial agreement. The divorce was finalized in 1962 and Joan’s suit to set aside the antenuptial agreement was dismissed. Meyer incurred $3,000 in legal fees defending the lawsuit to invalidate the antenuptial agreement. He deducted the fees as an ordinary and necessary non-business expense. The Commissioner (defendant) disallowed the deduction.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Simpson, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 744,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 744,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,100 briefs, keyed to 987 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 744,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,100 briefs - keyed to 987 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership