Fleming v. Spencer

2002 WL 171249 (2002)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Fleming v. Spencer

Washington Court of Appeals
2002 WL 171249 (2002)

SC
Play video

Facts

Norman Spencer (defendant) and Sheila Fleming (plaintiff) moved in together in 1983. At the time, Spencer was separated but not divorced from another woman, his then-wife. Spencer’s divorce was finalized not finalized until 1985. Late in 1983, Spencer took out a loan and bought a parcel of land. Spencer paid off the loan using his and Fleming’s joint funds. From 1984 to 1999, Spencer and Fleming lived together on the property, with temporary exceptions only for Spencer’s job and Fleming’s education. Spencer and Fleming filed joint-income tax returns, had joint bank accounts, and paid bills jointly. Fleming brought suit against Spencer, seeking a dissolution of their meretricious relationship. As part of the dissolution, Fleming sought a distribution of assets, including the property that Spencer had purchased in 1983. The trial court granted the dissolution and awarded the property to Fleming as part of the asset distribution. Spencer appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Per curiam)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 811,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership