Fleminger v. Health and Human Services
United States District Court for the District of Connecticut
854 F. Supp. 2d 192 (2012)

- Written by Alex Ruskell, JD
Facts
Fleminger, Inc. (plaintiff) made and sold green tea. Fleminger asked the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to approve a qualified health claim that drinking green tea may reduce the risk of breast or prostate cancer. The FDA refused and told Fleminger that it would only approve a qualified health claim that said “Green tea may reduce the risk of breast or prostate cancer. FDA does not agree that green tea may reduce the risk because there is very little scientific evidence for the claim.” The FDA said that “does not agree” ensured that consumers did not think the FDA approved the claim. Fleminger sued, arguing that the required disclaimer violated its First Amendment rights.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Bryant, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.