Flemming v. Nestor

363 U.S. 603 (1960)

Study Aids
Case Briefs Overview
Casebooks
Case Briefs
F
From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Flemming v. Nestor

United States Supreme Court
363 U.S. 603 (1960)

SR

Facts

Ephram Nestor (plaintiff) emigrated from Bulgaria in 1913. Nestor worked in the United States from 1936 to 1955, during which time Nestor and his employers made regular payments to a federal old-age-and-survivors-insurance trust fund. Nestor became eligible for old-age benefits in 1955. In July 1956, Nestor was deported for having been a member of the Communist Party from 1933 to 1939. Pursuant to section 202(n) of the Social Security Act (Act), 42 U.S.C. § 301, et seq., Nestor’s old-age-insurance benefits were terminated because he had been deported for membership in the Communist Party. Nestor challenged the termination of his old-age-insurance benefits. The United States District Court for the District of Columbia held that section 202(n) of the Act was unconstitutional because it deprived Nestor of an accrued property right. Arthur Flemming (defendant), the U.S. secretary of health, education, and welfare, appealed directly to the United States Supreme Court.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Harlan, J.)

Dissent (Black, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 811,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership

Casebooks

Administrative Law
Criminal Law
Employment Law

Key Terms