Fletcher International, Ltd v. Ion Geophysical Corporation

2010 Del. Ch. LEXIS 125 (2010)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Fletcher International, Ltd v. Ion Geophysical Corporation

Delaware Chancery Court
2010 Del. Ch. LEXIS 125 (2010)

  • Written by Heather Whittemore, JD

Facts

Fletcher International, Ltd. (Fletcher) (plaintiff) owned all Series D preferred stock of ION Geophysical Corporation (ION) (defendant). The Series D stock certificates provided the voting rights of the stockholders and explained that the holders had to authorize the issuance or sale of any security by an ION subsidiary. In 2009 ION caused ION S.àr.l. (the ION subsidiary), a wholly owned subsidiary, to issue a convertible promissory note to BGP, Inc., without receiving approval of the holders of preferred stock. The promissory note was convertible into shares of ION common stock. Fletcher filed a lawsuit in Delaware state court against ION and its directors. Fletcher brought a breach-of-contract claim against ION, alleging that ION had violated the stock certificate by issuing the convertible promissory note through the ION subsidiary without receiving preferred-shareholder approval. Fletcher also alleged that ION’s directors had breached their fiduciary duty by failing to obtain Fletcher’s approval before issuing the note. Fletcher filed a motion for summary judgment. ION opposed the motion, arguing it did not have to get approval to issue the promissory note because the note was not a security. ION further argued that if the note was a security, it was a security of ION rather than the ION subsidiary because it was convertible into ION common stock. Therefore, ION reasoned that the stock certificate did not require shareholder approval for the issuance of the note. ION also argued that Fletcher’s fiduciary-duty claim should be dismissed because it duplicated the breach-of-contract claim.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Parsons, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership