Fletcher v. A.J. Industries, Inc.
California Court of Appeal
72 Cal. Rptr. 146, 266 Cal. App. 2d 313 (1968)
- Written by DeAnna Swearingen, LLM
Facts
Shareholders (plaintiffs) filed a derivative action against A.J. Industries, Inc. (AJ), directors Ver Halen and Malone, and other board members (defendants). The shareholders alleged that Ver Halen had “dominated” company management and caused substantial harm. Ver Halen also allegedly breached his employment contract. The shareholders also argued that Malone had been excessively compensated. The shareholders sought damages of $134,000 from Ver Halen and $1,000,000 from the other named defendants, as well as equitable relief. During settlement negotiations, the parties agreed to a deal that included amendments to Ver Halen’s employment contract and limitations on his voting power, Malone’s ouster, the insertion of four new directors on the board, and the employment of a new operations officer. The specific instances of mismanagement by Ver Halen were to be referred to a future arbitration, which would be empowered to award attorneys’ fees to the shareholders’ attorneys only if AJ received a monetary award. The parties knew that the shareholders’ attorneys would apply for fees and costs from the trial court. The trial court awarded $64,784 in attorneys’ fees and $2,179.26 in costs after determining that (1) the shareholders hired the attorneys in good faith to prosecute the suit, (2) the company could pay the fees, and (3) AJ received substantial benefits from the settlement. The award of attorneys’ fees was appealed to the California Court of Appeal.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Rattigan, J.)
Dissent (Christian, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 899,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 47,000 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.


