From our private database of 33,600+ case briefs...
Fletcher v. Price Chopper Foods of Trumann, Inc.
United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
220 F.3d 871 (2000)
Facts
Linda Fletcher (plaintiff) worked for Price Chopper Foods of Trumann, Inc. (PCF) (defendant). Fletcher had a diabetic ulcer on her foot that required dressing at a hospital three times a week. The ulcer became infected with staph. Fletcher told two coworkers about the infection immediately upon learning of it. The coworkers informed the store manager. PCF’s corporate manager, Marlene Sawyer, terminated Fletcher’s employment because employees with communicable diseases were prohibited from working in the food-preparation industry. When Fletcher applied for unemployment benefits, she denied having an infection. To resolve the inconsistency, Sawyer contacted Fletcher’s doctor, provided a copy of Fletcher’s medical authorization for workers’-compensation benefits rather than a medical-information waiver given to PCF, and informed the nurse that Fletcher had once removed the bandage on her foot during work. The nurse understood Sawyer to be saying that Fletcher was not following her doctor’s instructions and had the doctor write to Sawyer reiterating that Fletcher should not expose her infection to the air. Fletcher sued PCF for invasion of privacy. At the end of Fletcher’s case, the court denied PCF’s motion for judgment as a matter of law. The jury found in favor of Fletcher on her invasion-of-privacy claim. PCF appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Bye, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 602,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 33,600 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
