From our private database of 33,600+ case briefs...
Flomerfelt v. Cardiello
New Jersey Supreme Court
202 N.J. 432, 997 A.2d 991 (2010)
Wendy Flomerfelt (plaintiff) went to a party at the home of Matthew Cardiello (defendant). Cardiello provided Flomerfelt drugs and alcohol. Flomerfelt was later found unresponsive. After a failed effort to call Flomerfelt’s sister to take Flomerfelt to the hospital, Cardiello called rescue personnel. Flomerfelt was treated for injuries that were “probably secondary to drug overdose.” Flomerfelt mostly recovered but suffered permanent, partial hearing loss. Flomerfelt sued Cardiello, producing an expert witness who opined that Flomerfelt’s injuries were caused by the ingestion of drugs and alcohol and that her injuries were exacerbated by Cardiello’s delay in summoning rescue personnel. Cardiello’s expert witness suggested that Flomerfelt’s injuries could have resulted from prior drug use and that Flomerfelt’s injuries would have happened even had rescue personnel been summoned sooner. Cardiello tendered Flomerfelt’s complaint to his homeowner’s insurer, Pennsylvania General (plaintiff), seeking a defense and indemnification. Pennsylvania General declined to provide either and relied on an exclusion for losses “arising out of the use . . . of controlled substance(s).” To resolve the issues of the duties to defend and indemnify, Pennsylvania General sued Cardiello in a declaratory-judgment action, which was consolidated with Flomerfelt’s personal-injury action. The trial court found that Pennsylvania General had a duty to defend and indemnify. The appellate court reversed. Cardiello appealed to the New Jersey Supreme Court.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Hoens, J.)
Concurrence (LaVecchia, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 602,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 602,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 33,600 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.