Florence v. Goldberg
New York Court of Appeals
375 N.E.2d 763 (1978)
- Written by Dan Lake, JD
Facts
Florence (plaintiff) accompanied her six-year-old son to school for two weeks. During those two weeks, Florence saw that the police department had stationed crossing guards at intersections near the school. After noticing this protection, Florence allowed her son to travel to school alone. On the day of Florence’s son's first unaccompanied trip, no crossing guard was present at the intersection near the school. A car struck the son in the unattended intersection, causing him severe injuries. Florence brought a negligence claim on behalf of her son against the city and the driver of the car (defendants). The jury returned a verdict in favor of Florence, which the appellate court affirmed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Jasen, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 807,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.