Florida Department of Children and Family Services v. McKim
Florida District Court of Appeal
869 So. 2d 760 (2004)
- Written by Angela Patrick, JD
Facts
Jo Lynn McKim (defendant) was an adult with a history of alcohol abuse and self-neglect. McKim had mobility issues and required assistance with bathing, dressing, and using the toilet. McKim also had cognitive issues and could not make informed decisions. McKim regularly failed to take her prescription medications and was frequently dehydrated and malnourished. One day, McKim was found at home, covered in feces, and she had not consumed any liquid or food for days. McKim’s condition was serious enough that McKim required hospitalization. The Florida Department of Children and Family Services (department) (plaintiff) filed a petition to have McKim placed under state protective services and to be cared for at a state facility. McKim opposed the petition, refusing to accept any protective services. The trial court found that McKim was legally incompetent, had engaged in self-neglect, and was unable to care for herself. However, the trial court also found that no caregiver had abused or neglected McKim and that McKim had not consented to any protective services. Therefore, the trial court ruled that it lacked the authority to place McKim under the state’s protective services and dismissed the petition. The department appealed. On appeal, the department argued that even if the statute technically did not authorize the court to force a nonconsenting, incompetent person to accept protective services, the statute’s spirit allowed a court to force the services on an incompetent person if needed to protect her from her own self-neglect.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Per curiam)
What to do next…
Here's why 815,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.