Florida Key Deer v. Brown
United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida
386 F. Supp. 2d 1281 (2005)
The National Wildlife Federation, Florida Wildlife Federation, and Defenders of Wildlife (plaintiffs) brought suit under the Endangered Species Act (ESA), 16 U.S.C. § 1531, and the Administrative Procedure Act (APA), 5 U.S.C. §§ 551-59, on behalf of eight endangered and threatened species in the Florida Keys. The suit was brought against Michael Brown (defendant) in his official capacity as the undersecretary of Emergency Preparedness and Response for the Department of Homeland Security, which includes the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), as well as Gale Norton (defendant) in her official capacity as the secretary of the Department of the Interior, which includes the Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS). The plaintiffs sought to compel FEMA to enter ESA consultation with FWS regarding FEMA’s implementation of the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) in the Florida Keys. Following a court order of consultation, FWS found FEMA’s administration of the NFIP in the Florida Keys to be jeopardizing the eight endangered species. FWS found that any further habitat loss would result in permanent losses to the land available in the area for the protected species and that the main threat to the existence of the protected species was the change in habitat caused by residential and commercial construction. The plaintiffs moved for a permanent injunction against FEMA’s issuance of flood insurance for any new development in the habitats of certain species in Monroe County, Florida. The defendants argued that the interests of the National Association of Home Builders (NAHB), an association of private developers, represented the public interest and outweighed other interests relating to the protection of endangered species. The defendants further argued that the court lacked the authority to prohibit FEMA from issuing new flood-insurance policies within the habitats, because FEMA lacked the discretion to limit the availability of flood insurance in an otherwise-eligible community.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Moore, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 724,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 724,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 45,500 briefs, keyed to 983 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.