Florida v. Riley

488 U.S. 445 (1989)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Florida v. Riley

United States Supreme Court
488 U.S. 445 (1989)

Play video

Facts

An officer with the Pasco County Sheriff’s Office visited the rural mobile home of Riley (defendant) to investigate an anonymous tip that marijuana was being grown on the property. A partially enclosed greenhouse was located 10 to 20 feet away from the home inside a wire fence, but the officer could not see the contents from the road. The officer then flew over the property in a helicopter at a height of 400 feet, which allowed him to see marijuana plants through the open sides and missing panels of the greenhouse roof. As a result, a warrant was issued, and marijuana was found growing in the greenhouse. Riley was arrested for possession of marijuana under Florida law. The lower court certified to the Florida Supreme Court the question of whether the aerial observation in this case constituted a search requiring a warrant under the Fourth Amendment. The court held that it did. The United States Supreme Court issued a plurality opinion on the issue.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (White, J.)

Concurrence (O’Connor, J.)

Dissent (Brennan, J.)

Dissent (Blackmun, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 811,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership