Floyd v. Garrison
United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
996 F.2d 947 (8th Cir. 1993)
A black woman, Mattie Ruth Floyd (plaintiff), brought a civil rights suit against white officer Marty Garrison (defendant), alleging that he used unlawful force in the shooting death of Jason Floyd. Before trial, Floyd requested that the jury pool be dissolved because there was only one black prospective juror in the pool of 40. The motion was denied. The jury found for Garrison, and Floyd moved for a new trial. The district court again denied Floyd’s motion. Floyd appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit, arguing that limiting the jury pool to registered voters violated the Jury Selection and Service Act of 1968 (the Act), 28 U.S.C. § 1861, et. seq., and the right of equal protection guaranteed by the Fifth Amendment.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Fagg, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 175,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.