From our private database of 33,800+ case briefs...
Flynn v. Holder
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
684 F.3d 852 (2012)
Bone marrow is a soft fatty material, found in the center of large bones, that produces new blood cells for the body. Bone marrow was traditionally donated by extracting the marrow from donors’ bones with a long needle (i.e., aspiration). However, in the last 20 years, a new technique called peripheral blood stem cell apheresis was introduced. Through peripheral blood stem cell apheresis, the necessary stem cells are extracted by taking blood from donors’ veins. The National Organ Transplant Act (Act) classified bone marrow as a human organ and prohibited individuals from being compensated for their bone-marrow donations, thus limiting the number of potential donors. Parents of children with terminal diseases, a physician, and MoreMarrowDonors.org, a not-for-profit advocacy organization (plaintiffs), filed suit in federal district court against Eric Holder, Jr., (defendant) in his official capacity as Attorney General of the United States. Plaintiffs claimed that the Act violated the Equal Protection Clause of the U.S. Constitution because the Act prohibited compensation for donating bone marrow but did not prohibit compensation for donating blood, sperm, or eggs. According to plaintiffs, bone-marrow collection through apheresis could be accomplished quickly and without removing marrow, and the donor's body would quickly regenerate the donated stem cells. Thus, plaintiffs claimed the distinction between bone-marrow donation and the other types of compensable donation had no rational basis and was an equal-protection violation. The district court dismissed plaintiffs’ complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief could be granted. Plaintiffs appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Kleinfeld, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 604,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 604,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 33,800 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.