Flynn v. Holder
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
684 F.3d 852 (9th Cir. 2012)
The National Organ Transplant Act (Act) banned compensating donors of human organs, including bone marrow and “any subpart thereof.” A non-profit organization seeking to incentivize people to donate bone marrow (Flynn) (plaintiffs) brought suit against the government (Holder) (defendant), seeking a declaration that the ban on compensating bone marrow donors was unconstitutional. While bone marrow was traditionally donated by extracting the marrow from donors’ bones with a long needle, in the last 20 years, a new technique, called peripheral blood stem cell apheresis, was introduced. Through peripheral blood stem cell apheresis, the necessary stem cells are extracted by taking blood from donors’ veins.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Kleinfeld, C.J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 171,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 13,800 briefs, keyed to 187 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.