FOGADE v. ENB Revocable Trust
United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
263 F.3d 1274 (2001)
- Written by Ryan McCarthy, JD
Facts
FOGADE (plaintiff), the Venezuelan government-agency equivalent of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, provided $300 million to Corpofin, a failing bank. FOGADE placed Corpofin in receivership when conditions of the bank did not improve. Santaella, Leanez, and Zamora (defendants) were removed as directors. FOGADE discovered that $30 million worth of Eastern National Bank (ENB) shares were sold to ENB Revocable Trust for less than $1 million. ENB Revocable Trust was controlled by the defendants. ENB was a United States bank located in Florida. FOGADE sued in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida to recover the shares. The defendants raised the affirmative defense that FOGADE lacked standing, because FOGADE illegally confiscated the defendants’ rights in Corpofin, and that recovery of the ENB shares would also be a confiscation of the defendants’ rights in violation of the law. FOGADE challenged the defendants’ affirmative defense, arguing that the act-of-state doctrine prevents a United States court from considering a defense based on the illegal actions of a foreign nation. The defendants responded that the Second Hickenlooper Amendment (the Amendment) prevents a court from applying the act-of-state doctrine to claims of confiscation in violation of international law. The district court granted FOGADE’s summary judgment. The defendants appealed to United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Carnes, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 806,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.