Logourl black
From our private database of 14,100+ case briefs...

Fogarty v. State

Supreme Court of Georgia
513 S.E.2d 493 (1999)


Facts

Mark Fogarty (defendant) was arrested and charged by the State of Georgia with kidnapping, aggravated assault, battery, and stalking. Without Fogarty’s knowledge, Fogarty’s wife entered into an agreement to pay Fogarty’s counsel a $25,000 advanced fee. Fogarty’s wife and counsel also agreed that if the charges against Fogarty were dismissed and a different suspect identified, the fee would be reduced to $10,000. Fogarty’s charges were not dismissed. The jury acquitted Fogarty of some counts but found him guilty on others. Fogarty appealed his conviction and argued that the fee arrangement between his wife and counsel created a conflict of interest for his counsel, which adversely affected his counsel’s performance. Specifically, Fogarty argued that his counsel would receive more money if the case were not dismissed, and therefore, his counsel had no incentive to have the case dismissed. The appeals court affirmed Fogarty’s conviction. The appeals court concluded that, although the arrangement between Fogarty’s counsel and Fogarty’s wife was an improper contingency-fee arrangement, Fogarty did not prove that the fee arrangement affected his counsel’s performance. Fogarty appealed, claiming ineffective assistance of counsel.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Carley, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A "yes" or "no" answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Concurrence (Sears, J.)

The concurrence section is for members only and includes a summary of the concurring judge or justice’s opinion.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 220,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.