Fogleman v. Peruvian Associates
Arizona Court of Appeals
622 P.2d 63 (1980)
- Written by Jayme Weber, JD
Facts
Peruvian Associates (Associates) (defendant) hired James Fogleman (plaintiff) to work at a copper mine in Peru. Fogleman’s contract was for a two-year term. However, Associates fired Fogleman six months after he and his wife Dawn (plaintiff) moved to Peru. The Foglemans sued Associates for breach of the employment contract. The trial court awarded the Foglemans damages that included interest accruing from the date of the trial court’s award. The trial court specifically found that Associates had unlawfully fired Fogleman without cause. The court also found that the Foglemans had suffered emotional distress and embarrassment, but the court did not award damages for these harms. The court further found that the firing was wanton and reckless conduct by Associates. The Foglemans appealed, arguing that they should have received damages for the injury to their reputations that Associates’ breach of contract caused. The Foglemans also argued that they were entitled to punitive damages, and that the interest should have accrued from the time of Associates’ breach.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Hathaway, C.J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.