Fondation Solomon R. Guggenheim v. Consorts Helion-Rumney
France Court of Cassation
CA (1st Ch.), 17 November 1993, 83 Rev. cr. D.P. II 115 (1994)
- Written by Curtis Parvin, JD
Facts
Peggy Guggenheim gave her Venice, Italy, mansion and its art collection to the Solomon R. Guggenheim Foundation (the foundation) (defendant), with the proviso that the building’s interior arrangements remain without modifications. David Hellion, Nicholas Helion, and Sandro Rumney, Guggenheim’s descendants (the descendants) (plaintiffs), felt that the foundation failed to respect Guggenheim’s wishes and sued the foundation in Paris, France, where the descendants lived. The foundation challenged the court’s jurisdiction under the Brussels Convention of 1968 (the convention), asserting that the foundation was domiciled in Italy as a secondary seat and, therefore, must be sued where the property was located. The descendants argued that French courts had jurisdiction under French law because they lived in France, and the foundation was a New York business. The court of first instance in Paris determined that it had jurisdiction over the matter. The foundation appealed to the France Court of Cassation. [Editor’s Note: The Court of Cassation is France’s highest court for civil and criminal matters.]
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Per curiam)
What to do next…
Here's why 812,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.