Fong Yue Ting v. United States
United States Supreme Court
149 U.S. 698 (1893)
Fong Yue Ting (defendant) applied on April 11, 1893 to the collector of revenue for a certificate of residence, as required by the Chinese Exclusion Act passed in 1892. The collector of revenue denied the certificate because Yue Ting was unable to produce non-Chinese witnesses to prove that he was entitled to the certificate, and the collector deemed Chinese witnesses not to be credible. Because Yue Ting was unable to obtain a certificate of residence, he was arrested for lack of such a certificate. The judge ordered Yue Ting deported after he failed to produce a credible white witness as required by statute. Yue Ting petitioned for a writ of habeas corpus, which was denied by the district court. The Supreme Court granted certiorari on a consolidated appeal with two similar cases.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Gray, J)
Dissent (Brewer, J)
Dissent (Field, J)
Dissent (Fuller, CJ)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 166,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 13,800 briefs, keyed to 187 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.