From our private database of 33,800+ case briefs...
Fong Yue Ting v. United States
United States Supreme Court
149 U.S. 698, 13 S.Ct. 1016, 37 L.Ed. 905 (1893)
In 1882, Congress passed the Chinese Exclusion Act. In 1892, Congress added a requirement that Chinese people in the U.S. had to possess certificates of residence or be summarily deported. Fong Yue Ting (defendant) came to the United States from China in or before 1879, intending to make the U.S. his permanent home. Fong hadn’t yet applied for a certificate of residence when a marshal arrested him in 1893. Wong Quan’s (defendant) story was similar. After he was arrested, the marshal took him before the district judge in the southern district of New York. The judge didn’t conduct a hearing. He ordered the marshal to hold Wong in custody and then deport him. Lee Joe (defendant) had actually applied for a certificate of residence on April 11th, 1893, bringing along Chinese witnesses to testify that he’d been in the country legally in 1892. The collector of internal revenue refused to grant Lee a certificate on the ground that he hadn’t produced at least one credible white witness as required by the statute. The marshal arrested him, and the judge ordered him deported. All three men petitioned for writs of habeas corpus. They alleged that they had been arrested and detained without due process of law, and their detentions were thus unconstitutional and void. The United States circuit court dismissed each writ of habeas corpus but allowed each man to appeal to the United States Supreme Court.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Gray, J)
Dissent (Brewer, J)
Dissent (Field, J)
Dissent (Fuller, CJ)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 604,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 604,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 33,800 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.