Food and Allied Service Trades Department v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.

18 Del. J. Corp. L. 651 (1992)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Food and Allied Service Trades Department v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.

Delaware Court of Chancery
18 Del. J. Corp. L. 651 (1992)

Facts

Food and Allied Service Trades Department, AFL-CIO (FAST) (plaintiff) was an unincorporated labor organization that owned a few shares of Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.’s (Wal-Mart) (defendant) common stock. In 1992, FAST delivered to Wal-Mart a written demand under oath seeking a list of the corporation’s stockholders and related documents. The demand stated that FAST sought to inspect the stockholder list to communicate with other Wal-Mart stockholders and solicit proxies in support of its proposed shareholders’ resolution recommending the board of directors take certain steps to study and report on Wal-Mart’s buying policies and practices in China to ensure Wal-Mart did not purchase products produced by forced labor. Wal-Mart refused to comply with the demand. Accordingly, FAST sued Wal-Mart for an order compelling Wal-Mart to allow it to inspect its stockholder list and related materials. During trial before the Delaware Court of Chancery, FAST’s president, Robert F. Harbrant, testified about the origin of FAST’s interest in eliminating the worldwide purchase of goods produced by forced labor as morally repugnant. Harbrant also testified that in 1991, after FAST took issue with Wal-Mart publicly announcing a “Buy American” campaign, it circulated information to consumers explaining how to determine where a product was made.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Allen, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 805,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 805,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 805,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership