Ford Motor Co. v. Matthews
Mississippi Supreme Court
291 So.2d 169 (1974)
- Written by Sean Carroll, JD
Facts
Earnest Matthews bought a tractor manufactured by Ford (defendant). Ford did not warn Matthews of a defect in the tractor’s safety switch. The safety switch was designed to keep the tractor from starting in gear. Without checking that the tractor was out of gear, Matthews started the motor from the ground. The tractor started in gear, and Matthews was run over and killed. The administratrix of Matthews’s estate (plaintiff) brought suit on a theory of strict product liability, claiming that the safety switch was defective. In defense, Ford argued that Matthews had misused the tractor. The trial court found in favor of the administratrix. Ford appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Rodgers, P.J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 810,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.