Ford Motor Co. v. Zahn
United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
265 F.2d 729 (1959)
- Written by Sean Carroll, JD
Facts
Marvin Zahn (plaintiff) was riding in a car manufactured by Ford Motor Company (Ford) (defendant). Zahn leaned forward to retrieve a cigarette, and the driver of the car slammed on the brakes to avoid another car. Zahn’s head jolted forward into a sharp protrusion extending from an ashtray that was mounted on the dashboard. Zahn lost his eye as a result. Zahn sued for negligence, alleging that the protrusion should not have been there and had been caused by a dull cutting die in the manufacturing process. Ford argued that its inspection was reasonable in light of the foreseeable risk of injury. Specifically, Ford stated that a lost eye was not a reasonably foreseeable injury resulting from the defect. A Ford witness testified that the ashtray-inspection process was a sampling operation, in that Ford did not inspect every ashtray. A jury found in favor of Zahn and awarded him $26,350. Ford appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Matthes, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 806,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
