Logourl black

Ford Motor Credit Co. v. Morgan

Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts
536 N.E.2d 587 (1989)


Facts

Rose and William Morgan (Morgans) (defendants) purchased a car from a dealer on June 27, 1978. The dealer assured the Morgans that the car was reliable. The Morgans financed their purchase through Ford Motor Credit Company (Ford Motor) (plaintiff). The Morgans were to pay Ford Motor in monthly installments. During the fall of 1979, the Morgans began experiencing problems with the car and stopped paying the monthly installments. Ford Credit eventually repossessed the vehicle and sued for the money owed on the contract. The Morgans argued that they were not responsible for any further payments because of the dealer’s fraud and misrepresentation. The Morgans further argued for a return of the amount already paid to Ford Credit. The trial court held that the Morgans were not liable for any future payments, but denied the affirmative recovery for return of money already paid to Ford Credit. The Morgans appealed.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Holding and Reasoning (O’Connor, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.