From our private database of 14,100+ case briefs...
Ford v. Albany Medical Center
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York
724 N.Y.S.2d 795 (2001)
In February 1998, Sandra Ford (plaintiff) consulted with attorney Eugene Spada regarding a potential medical-malpractice claim against Albany Medical Center (defendant) based on her daughter’s medical treatment. On April 8, 1988, attorney Charles Harding sent a letter to Spada, notifying Spada that Ford had retained Harding to handle the claim instead. Harding’s letter asked Spada to sign a form consenting to the change of counsel, and noted that Harding would split fees with Spada in an equitable manner because Ford had originally hired Spada. The next day, Spada and Harding spoke on the phone and agreed that Spada would receive 33.33 percent of any fee. Spada requested that Harding confirm the fee split in writing. Harding sent Spada a check to pay for expenses, but did not mention an agreement about splitting fees. On May 12, 1998, Spada wrote to Harding and again asked for confirmation. A week later, Spada received a letter from Harding confirming the fee split. Ford’s case was settled, and the state supreme court determined the fee for legal services to be $99,701.48. Spada petitioned for 33.33 percent of the fee, and Harding cross-petitioned to extinguish Spada’s claim. The supreme court found that Spada had an attorney-client relationship with Ford and was entitled to a portion of the fee based on quantum meruit, which was to be determined at a hearing. The supreme court also found that the confirmation letter was sent from Harding’s office without his authorization and did not create a binding agreement between Harding and Spada. Spada appealed, arguing that the fee-split agreement was enforceable.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Lahtinen, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 221,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.