Quimbee logo
DMCA.com Protection Status
From our private database of 16,900+ case briefs...

Ford v. Revlon, Inc.

Arizona Supreme Court
734 P.2d 580 (1987)


Leta Fay Ford (plaintiff) worked at Revlon, Inc. (Revlon) (defendant) for ten years, most recently in the company’s purchasing department in Phoenix, Arizona. Revlon hired Karl Braun (defendant), a purchasing department manager, and was thus Ford’s supervisor. During a “business” dinner and later at a company picnic, Braun made inappropriate sexual comments and touched Ford in a sexual manner. After Ford rejected Braun’s advances, he informed her that she would “regret this.” Thereafter, Ford spoke with a number of Revlon personnel about the unwanted contact and statements made by Braun. When meeting with a personnel manager, Ford became very emotional when recounting the incidents and said that she was afraid of Braun. Ford also petitioned for a transfer out of the purchasing department. During the time of the harassment, Ford developed high blood pressure, a nervous tic in her left eye, chest pains, rapid breathing, and other symptoms. After Ford had spent more than nine months speaking to various Revlon personnel, Braun was first confronted and told that he would be “closely monitored.” A full year and one month after Braun’s initial act of harassment he was issued a letter of censure from Revlon. Almost four months later, Ford attempted suicide. Shortly thereafter, Braun was terminated. Ford brought suit against Braun and Revlon for assault and battery and for intentional infliction of emotional distress. A jury found Braun liable for assault and battery, but not liable for intentional infliction of emotional distress and found Revlon liable for intentional infliction of emotional distress, but not liable for assault and battery. Revlon appealed. The court of appeals reversed and held since Braun, as an agent of Revlon, could be found not guilty of intentional infliction of emotional distress, then Revlon, as principal, could not be found guilty. The Arizona Supreme Court granted review of the case.

Rule of Law


Holding and Reasoning (Cameron, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 453,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 453,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 16,900 briefs, keyed to 226 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Questions & Answers

Have a question about this case?

Sign up for a free 7-day trial and ask it

Sign up for a FREE 7-day trial