Foremost Insurance Co. v. Richardson
United States Supreme Court
457 U.S. 668, 102 S.Ct. 2654, 73 L.Ed.2d 300, 1982 AMC 2253 (1982)
- Written by Carolyn Strutton, JD
Facts
Clyde Richardson and Shirley Eliser were both driving small pleasure boats on the Amite River in Louisiana when the boats collided and Richardson was killed. Richardson’s wife and children (Richardson’s heirs) (plaintiffs) sued Eliser and the Foremost Insurance Company (Foremost) (defendants) in federal district court under admiralty jurisdiction, alleging that Eliser had been negligent in the collision. Eliser and Foremost moved to dismiss, alleging that the complaint did not state a cause of action under admiralty jurisdiction. The district court granted the motion to dismiss for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction, reasoning that because neither boat had ever been used for commercial activity there was no connection to traditional maritime activity. The court of appeals reversed the dismissal, and Eliser and Foremost appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Marshall, J.)
Dissent (Powell, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 805,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.