Logourl black
From our private database of 14,000+ case briefs...

Forster v. Boss

United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
97 F.3d 1127 (1996)


Facts

James and Joann Forster (plaintiffs) purchased lakefront property in Missouri from Patrick and Janet Boss (defendants). The Bosses represented that the Forsters could obtain a permit for a boat dock on the property. However, the Bosses already had a boat dock permit, which made it impossible for the Forsters to obtain one. Additionally, the Bosses promised to remove a swim dock from the front of the property but failed to do so. The Forsters sued the Bosses for fraud and breach of contract. Union Electric Company (Union) (defendant) was also made a defendant to the action. Union is the entity that grants permits for boat docks. Union entered into a stipulation that it would grant a permit to the Bosses if it was determined that the Bosses were entitled to a permit under the land purchase agreement. After trial, the jury found for the Forsters and awarded compensatory damages, punitive damages, and an injunction. On the claim regarding the boat dock permit, the jury awarded $12,250 in compensatory damages and $10,000 in punitive damages to the Bosses. The Bosses also obtained the permit for the boat dock. On the swim dock issue, the jury awarded $2,500 in compensatory damages. The Bosses also obtained a permanent injunction requiring the Forsters to remove the swim dock. The Forsters appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Arnold, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Concurrence (Kornmann, J.)

The concurrence section is for members only and includes a summary of the concurring judge or justice’s opinion.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 175,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.