Forsythe v. Clark USA, Inc.

864 N.E.2d 227 (2007)

From our private database of 46,400+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Forsythe v. Clark USA, Inc.

Illinois Supreme Court
864 N.E.2d 227 (2007)

  • Written by Rose VanHofwegen, JD

Facts

Mechanics Michael Forsythe and Gary Szabla died in an oil-refinery fire. Their widows and estate administrators, Marguerite Forsythe and Elizabeth Szabla (plaintiffs) sued refinery operator Clark Refining and Marketing (Clark Refining) and its parent company, Clark USA (defendants). Michael and Gary had been in the lunchroom at the oil refinery when employees in an adjacent room tried to replace a valve without ensuring that a pipe containing flammable materials was depressurized. Allegedly the employees were not trained or qualified as maintenance mechanics. The widows claimed Clark USA was liable because its budgetary strategy eliminated spending that might have prevented the fire. In internal documents, Clark USA president and Clark Refining chief executive officer Paul Melnuk had prepared a “survival mode” strategy marked by reduced working-capital investment, spending, and operating expenses. Melnuk wrote the strategy on Clark USA letterhead but testified it was carried out for Clark Refining. Clark Refining allegedly had to minimize operating costs for training, maintenance, supervision, and safety; limit capital investments to cash-generating expenditures (not reinforcing or relocating the lunchroom); use inadequate safety and training procedures; and use unqualified employees as maintenance mechanics. The trial court granted Clark USA summary judgment. The appellate court reversed, and the Illinois Supreme Court granted review.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Garman, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,400 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership