United States Supreme Court
394 U.S. 440 (1969)
Foster and two other men (defendants) were charged with robbing a Western Union. Police conducted multiple lineups before June 12, 1967. The police conducted a lineup consisting of Foster, who was wearing clothing similar to the robbers, and two much shorter men. The Western Union manager could not positively identify Foster and asked to speak with Foster. Police allowed the manager to meet with Foster in an office. The manager was still uncertain. Later, police conducted another lineup with Foster and four other men. Foster was the only man present in both lineups. At that point the manager claimed to be certain Foster was the robber. The manager testified to all this at trial, and Foster was convicted. The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari to consider whether the lineup procedures were constitutional.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Fortas, J.)
Dissent (Black, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 240,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,200 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.