Foster v. Leggett

484 S.W.2d 827 (1972)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Foster v. Leggett

Kentucky Court of Appeals
484 S.W.2d 827 (1972)

Facts

John Leggett (defendant) was the driver of a car that crashed, killing Helen Stringer. Stringer lived and worked in Kentucky. Leggett worked with Stringer in Kentucky but resided primarily in Ohio. Leggett voted in Ohio, paid taxes in Ohio, held an Ohio driver’s license, and did his banking and other personal business in Ohio. However, Leggett also rented a room near his job in Kentucky, where he would stay, on average, two nights per week. On the day of the accident, Stringer and Leggett took a day trip from Kentucky into Ohio, with the intention of returning to Kentucky at the end of the day. The accident occurred in Ohio. Carole Foster (plaintiff), the administratrix of Stringer’s estate, filed suit in Kentucky state court asserting a claim for wrongful death against Leggett. In response, Leggett contended that the claim was barred by Ohio’s guest statute, which permitted passengers in noncommercial vehicles to recover damages against drivers only if they were injured or killed as a result of the driver’s willful and wanton misconduct. The trial court granted summary judgment in favor of Leggett. Foster appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Walden, J.)

Dissent (Reed, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership