Foster v. Seaton

271 F.2d 836 (1959)

Study Aids
Case Briefs Overview
Casebooks
Case Briefs
F
From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Foster v. Seaton

United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
271 F.2d 836 (1959)

  • Written by Tanya Munson, JD

Facts

The provisions of 30 U.S.C.A. 22, 29, 35 authorized occupation and purchase of government lands containing valuable mineral deposits. Everett Foster (plaintiff) had claims to valuable mineral deposits of sand and gravel 13 miles from the center of Las Vegas. The Department of Interior initiated proceedings to contest Foster’s claims on the ground that the deposits of sand and gravel were insufficient in quantity, quality, and accessibility to a market to constitute a valid discovery. The hearing officer found in favor of Foster. However, an appeal was filed by rival claimants who intervened to assert an interest in the land under the Small Tract Act, 43 U.S.C.A. 682a. The director of the Bureau of Land Management heard the appeal and reversed the hearing officer’s decision. The secretary of the Interior (defendant) affirmed the director’s ruling. Foster brought suit in district court under the Administrative Procedures Act to review the secretary’s decision, arguing that the secretary misinterpreted the statute by requiring a demonstration of the present value of the mineral deposits. Foster and the secretary cross-moved for summary judgment. The district court granted summary judgment in favor of the secretary. Foster appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Per curiam)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 824,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 824,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 989 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 824,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 989 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership

Casebooks

Natural Resources

Key Terms