Quimbee logo
DMCA.com Protection Status
From our private database of 18,300+ case briefs...

Fountain Valley Chateau Blanc Homeowner’s Ass'n v. Dep’t of Veterans Affairs

Court of Appeal of California
79 Cal. Rptr. 248 (1998)



Robert Cunningham (defendant) purchased a home subject to the covenants, conditions, and restrictions (CC&Rs) of the Fountain Valley Chateau Blanc Homeowner’s Association (Fountain Valley) (plaintiff). The CC&Rs included the obligation to maintain the interiors of the residential units in a clean, sanitary, and attractive condition, but reserved to the owners the right to decorate and furnish the interiors as they pleased. Cunningham purchased his home with the help of the United States Department of Veteran Affairs (the department) (defendant), which took title to the land under a land-sale installment contract. Fountain Valley complained about the paper, books, appliances, bookshelves, and other items on Cunningham’s land and inside his house. Fountain Valley threatened Cunningham with litigation if he did not let them inspect the property and remove his belongings. After Cunningham removed some of his belongings, Fountain Valley decided he had not removed enough and filed suit against Cunningham and the department. Subsequently, housing code and fire inspectors found no hazardous conditions on Cunningham’s property. Nevertheless, Fountain Valley sent Cunningham a letter demanding that he clear his bed of paper and books; remove paper, boxes, and books from the floors of his home; and get rid of old clothes. Cunningham, who had been representing himself, retained an attorney and filed a cross-complaint. In his cross-complaint, Cunningham alleged Fountain Valley had violated his right of privacy and committed trespass, negligence, and breach of contract using the threat of litigation to gain access to his home and force him to throw out personal belongings. Fountain Valley’s complaint was settled in August 1996. Cunningham’s cross-complaint was bifurcated into liability and damages portions. During the liability portion, the jury found Fountain Valley had acted unreasonably. The trial judge granted Fountain Valley’s motion for a new trial, stating he believed Fountain Valley had behaved reasonably.

Rule of Law


Holding and Reasoning (Sills, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 488,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 488,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 18,300 briefs, keyed to 985 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Questions & Answers

Have a question about this case?

Sign up for a free 7-day trial and ask it

Sign up for a FREE 7-day trial