Fourth Corner Credit Union v. Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City
United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
861 F.3d 1052 (2017)
- Written by Tanya Munson, JD
Facts
In 2012, Colorado amended its constitution to legalize recreational marijuana. In response, an industry of marijuana growers and retailers developed. Traditional banks were wary of serving these marijuana-related businesses (MRBs) because many MRBs operated solely in cash, which gave rise to public safety and regulatory concerns. The Fourth Corner Credit Union (Fourth Corner) (plaintiff) sought to fill the banking void and provide banking services to cannabis and hemp businesses and marijuana-legalization supporters. Fourth Corner applied to the Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City (Reserve Bank) (defendant) for a master account. A master account gave depository institutions access to the Federal Reserve System’s services, including its electronic payments system, and was essentially a bank account for banks. Reserve Bank denied Fourth Corner’s application because serving MRBs posed too great of a risk to the Federal Reserve System. Fourth Corner filed suit in district court seeking a declaratory judgment that Fourth Corner was entitled to a master account and an injunction requiring Reserve Bank to issue a master account to Fourth Corner. Reserve Bank moved to dismiss, arguing that Fourth Corner would use the master account to violate federal drug laws under the Controlled Substances Act (CSA). The CSA prohibited any person to manufacture, distribute, dispense, or possess with intent to manufacture, distribute, or dispense a controlled substance. Under the CSA, marijuana was a controlled substance. Fourth Corner filed a motion for summary judgment on its claim and argued that it would only serve MRBs if it was authorized to do so by law. The district court granted Reserve Bank’s motion to dismiss. Fourth Corner filed a motion for reconsideration. The district court denied the motion, and Fourth Corner appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Per curiam)
What to do next…
Here's why 820,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 989 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.