Fox Television Stations, Inc. v. Aereokiller, LLC

851 F.3d 1002 (2017)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Fox Television Stations, Inc. v. Aereokiller, LLC

United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
851 F.3d 1002 (2017)

Facts

FilmOn X (FilmOn) (defendant) used antennas to capture copyrighted over-the-air broadcast programming and then, without the consent of the copyright holders, retransmitted the programming over the Internet to paying subscribers. Fox Television Stations, Inc., along with other broadcast stations and copyright holders (collectively, Fox) (plaintiffs), sued FilmOn for copyright infringement. It was undisputed that FilmOn’s service was a public performance of the retransmitted works within the meaning of the Copyright Act of 1976 (the act) and therefore infringed the copyright holders’ exclusive performance rights. FilmOn argued, however, that its activities were covered by § 111 of the act, which provided that a cable system was eligible for a compulsory license allowing FilmOn to retransmit a performance or display of a work that was originally broadcast by someone else without having to obtain the copyright owner’s consent. Under the act, the cable system had to pay a nominal fee to the United States Copyright Office for the license but was protected from infringement liability. The district court found that FilmOn was a cable system for purposes of § 111 and entered judgment for FilmOn. Fox appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (O’Scannlain, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership