Fox v. Encounters International
United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
2006 WL 952317 (2006)
- Written by Haley Gintis, JD
Facts
Natasha Spivack (defendant) founded the international match-making agency Encounters International (EI). EI matched American male clients with female participants from Russia and the Ukraine. Spivack marketed EI as having a 95 percent success rate in establishing romantic relationships and marketed herself as a psychologist and a match-making expert. In 1998, Spivack introduced Nataliya Derkach Fox (plaintiff) to James Fox. Spivack assured Nataliya that James was a good client and taught Nataliya about American customs. Nataliya and James then married. Shortly after the marriage, James began abusing Nataliya. In 2000, Nataliya, who was pregnant, met with Spivack three separate times to seek help. Spivack informed Nataliya that she would be deported if she left James. Although Spivack was aware that a battered-spouse waiver existed, under which a domestic-violence victim may leave an abusive relationship on which citizenship is based without fear of being deported, Spivack did not disclose this information. Nataliya stayed with James and later gave birth. Three weeks later, James violently attacked Nataliya, which resulted in Nataliya’s hospitalization. Nataliya was referred to a woman’s shelter. At the shelter, Nataliya was informed of the battered-spouse waiver. Nataliya then filed an action against EI and Spivack on the ground that Spivack had breached a fiduciary duty and had committed fraud by misrepresenting that Nataliya had to remain in the marriage or fear deportation. A jury found EI and Spivack guilty and awarded Nataliya $341,500 in punitive damages. Spivack appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Per curiam)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.