Logourl black
From our private database of 14,100+ case briefs...

Fraley v. Facebook, Inc.

United States District Court for the Northern District of California
830 F. Supp. 2d 785 (2011)


Facts

Facebook, Inc. (defendant) operated a social-networking website. Facebook generated revenue through the sale of advertising targeted at its users. One advertising method was known as Sponsored Stories. When a user clicked the “like” button on an advertiser’s Facebook page, a Sponsored Story would appear on that user’s friends’ Facebook home page. The friends would see the user’s name, profile picture, and a statement that the user “liked” the advertiser. Angel Fraley (plaintiff) was a Facebook user. Fraley sued Facebook, arguing that the Sponsored Stories were a misappropriation of users’ names and likenesses for commercial endorsement without their consent. Thus, Fraley claimed that the Sponsored Stories violated Facebook users’ publicity rights under state law. Fraley also argued that merely clicking the “like” button is not necessarily an expression of consumer interest. Facebook moved to dismiss the publicity-violation claim. Facebook argued that its users consent to the use of their names and likenesses. Facebook also argued that users like Fraley are public figures to their friends, and public figures have less publicity rights. Finally, Facebook argued that expressions of consumer opinion and consumer interest are generally newsworthy and, therefore, using them does not violate the consumer’s publicity rights.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Koh, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A "yes" or "no" answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 221,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.