Franco-Gonzalez v. Holder
United States District Court for the Central District of California
828 F. Supp. 2d 1133 (2011)
- Written by Carolyn Strutton, JD
Facts
Maksim Zhalezny (plaintiff) came to the United States with his parents as a teenager from their native Belarus and became a lawful permanent resident. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (defendant) began removal proceedings against Zhalezny after he was convicted of thefts and burglary. Zhalezny was diagnosed with schizophrenia and was mentally incompetent and therefore unable to understand the nature of the immigration proceedings. The immigration judge adjudicating the removal proceedings made repeated efforts to obtain pro bono counsel for Zhalezny or involve Zhalezny’s parents in the proceedings and eventually asked Zhalezny’s father, Piotr, to consent to serve as a representative for Zhalezny. Piotr had only a basic knowledge of English, worked full-time as a newspaper deliveryman to support the family, required a translator, and did not understand the immigration proceedings or the charges that his son faced. The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) filed a letter on Zhalezny’s behalf stating that he would not have a fair removal hearing without attorney representation and eventually brought a class-action suit on behalf of mentally disabled immigration detainees that Zhalezny joined. As part of the class, Zhalezny filed a motion for a preliminary injunction to have a representative appointed either pro bono or at the government’s expense and for his release from detention. The matter came before the district court.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Gee, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 802,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.