Logourl black
From our private database of 14,100+ case briefs...

Frank Diehl Farms v. Secretary of Labor

United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
696 F.2d 1325 (11th Cir. 1983)


Facts

Frank Diehl Farms and several other Florida farmers (defendants) provided temporary housing to seasonal migrant workers at little to no cost. The workers were not required to live in the housing, and the defendants did not depend on the workers to live in the housing in order to maintain an adequate labor supply. Any worker who lived in the housing was required to work on the farm where he or she lived whenever work was available, but was otherwise free to work for other employers. The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) conducted an inspection of the temporary housing and found the housing to be in violation of standards set by the secretary of labor (plaintiff) pursuant to the Occupational Safety and Health Act (Act), 29 U.S.C. § 651 et seq. The Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission (OSHRC) ruled that the temporary housing was a workplace within the meaning and jurisdiction of the Act because the housing was directly related to employment. The defendants appealed, arguing that the temporary housing was outside the jurisdiction of the Act because the housing was not a condition of employment.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Vance, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A "yes" or "no" answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Dissent (Johnson, J.)

The dissent section is for members only and includes a summary of the dissenting judge or justice’s opinion.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 222,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.