Frank Diehl Farms v. Secretary of Labor
United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
696 F.2d 1325 (1983)
- Written by Sara Rhee, JD
Facts
Frank Diehl Farms and several other Florida farmers (defendants) provided temporary housing to seasonal migrant workers at little to no cost. The workers were not required to live in the housing, and the defendants did not depend on the workers to live in the housing in order to maintain an adequate labor supply. Any worker who lived in the housing was required to work on the farm where he or she lived whenever work was available, but was otherwise free to work for other employers. The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) conducted an inspection of the temporary housing and found the housing to be in violation of standards set by the secretary of labor (plaintiff) pursuant to the Occupational Safety and Health Act (Act), 29 U.S.C. § 651 et seq. The Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission (OSHRC) ruled that the temporary housing was a workplace within the meaning and jurisdiction of the Act because the housing was directly related to employment. The defendants appealed, arguing that the temporary housing was outside the jurisdiction of the Act because the housing was not a condition of employment.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Vance, J.)
Dissent (Johnson, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 778,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,200 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.