From our private database of 37,500+ case briefs...
Frank Music Corp. v. Metro-Goldwyn-Meyer, Inc.
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
886 F.2d 1545 (1989), cert. denied, 110 S. Ct. 1321 (1990)
Frank Music Corporation (Frank Music) (plaintiff) was the copyright owner of a musical play entitled Kismet. Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer, Incorporated (MGM) (defendant) licensed Kismet to make a motion picture. In 1974, MGM produced a live musical show entitled Hallelujah Hollywood (the show) for its Las Vegas hotel, the MGM Grand. Most showings of the show included 10 acts. Act IV of the show used the music, characters, and set design of Kismet in tribute to the original play. The show played seven days per week. Sunday through Friday, the show included all 10 acts and occurred twice per day, for a total of 100 minutes per show. On Saturday, the show included only eight acts, including Act IV, and was performed three times during the day, with a run time of 75 minutes per show. Act IV was 11.5 minutes long. From the time the show opened in 1974 until Act IV was replaced in response to litigation in 1976, Act IV was performed 1,700 times. Frank Music sued MGM for copyright infringement based on the inclusion of Act IV in the show. The original holding by the district court found MGM liable for copyright infringement. On appeal, the court upheld the liability determination, but remanded the case to the district court to reconsider the profits attributable to infringement. On remand, the district court awarded Frank Music $22,000 in damages, based on a calculation of $6,131,606 in revenues and a determination that Act IV constituted one-tenth of the show, because it was one of 10 acts. Additionally, it determined that the value of Act IV attributable to infringement was 25 percent, considering creative talent and performances by the show’s staff. The district court determined that indirect profits made from incidental revenue increase in, for instance, the casino and hotel bookings, was 2 percent attributable to the show. Finally, the district court determined that prejudgment interest was not available. Frank Music appealed the damages award.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Fletcher, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 631,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 631,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 37,500 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.