Logourl black
From our private database of 14,200+ case briefs...

Franklin v. Massachusetts

United States Supreme Court
505 U.S. 788 (1992)


Facts

Pursuant to a statute providing for the automatic reapportionment of seats in the United States House of Representatives (House), the Bureau of the Census (Bureau) (defendant) compiled the results of the 1990 census. Before reporting the census results to the president of the United States (defendant), the Bureau decided to allocate over 900,000 military personnel employed overseas to their home states of record. This decision resulted in both a decrease in the population of Massachusetts and an increase in the population of Washington. Secretary of Commerce Franklin (Secretary) (defendant) then reported the census results to the president. As required by the automatic-reapportionment statute, the president sent the Senate a statement of (1) the population totals for each state based on the census results and (2) the number of representatives to which each state was entitled according to a mathematical formula prescribed by Congress. Due to this reapportionment, Massachusetts (plaintiff) lost one House seat to Washington. Massachusetts and two of its citizens (plaintiffs) filed suit in federal district court against the president, the Secretary, and the Bureau, challenging the method used to count overseas federal employees for purposes of allocating House seats. The district court held that the method was an abuse of discretion under the Administrative Procedure Act (APA), 5 U.S.C. § 551 et seq. The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari to determine whether the method was reviewable under the APA.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (O’Connor, J.)

Concurrence (Scalia, J.)

Concurrence (Stevens, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 251,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,200 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.